I see very little outsole wear after a bit over 100 miles, but the rubber is soft, much softer than the Crystal Rubber that was used for the Freedoms. They have wide-widths, should you need wider. I find width to be good for Saucony in general. Sizing for Freedoms were consistent with Nike sizing, but the Triumph is sized more like an adidas, so a half-large large. Breathability is decent, not the best, but more than serviceable. Not like the pre-Ultraboost 19+ Ultraboosts, which were just ridiculously squishy and entirely unstable (Ultraboosts using the same BASF ETPU midsole, but with differing densities). Not a dedicated stability shoe, but quite stable. Unlike EVA (and PEBAX, from what I could gather), e.g., which will permanently compact much earlier than that. The positive with ETPU is that they last forever (1,000+ miles) in terms of retaining their impact protection.
Even their Endorphin series have higher stack-heights than the Triumphs, so don't know about these being their "most cushioned shoe." Moreover, PEBAX (PWRRUN PB, used in Endorphin Speed and Pro) is supposed to be plusher than ETPU, though I've never tried PEBAX. 18 mm for Freedom 1s that I had been using), so decent, but not the highest around these days. 24.5 mm stack-height at the forefoot (vs.
The PWRRUN+ is the same ETPU as the EVERUN, but may be around 10% less dense. I'm bone-on-bone at the knees, and these have been allowing me to run, whereas the Freedoms that I had been using for awhile got to a point where they weren't providing enough impact protection. But I'm used to heavier shoes in general. People say they're heavy, but they're light for me. Can anyone comment on how comfortable and supportive they are for long runs?